Preface • Introduction • Study Objectives • Community Participation • Regional, Physical and Ecological Setting Methods • Survey Protocol • Surveyors • Data Compilation • Data Analysis Results • Migration Chronology • Breeding Species • GSL Species Accounts • Species Distribution Discussion • Recommendations • Acknowledgements • Definitions/Abbreviations • Literature Cited Report & Appendices: 1 • 2 • 3 • 4 • 5 • 6 • 7 • 8 21-Year Waterbird Survey Synopsis & Appendices: 1B • 2B • 4B • 5B • 6B • 8B
|
Habitat UseAll count data for the years representing high and low lake conditions (1999 and 2001, respectively) show patterns of abundance for the following suites of species (Appendix 3). Ducks and dowitchers that favor fresh water in association with emergent wetlands were more abundant in 1999. Gulls, avocets/stilts and small sandpipers were more abundant during the low lake year of 2001. These groups prefer exposed shoreline and mudflats for nesting and foraging. Phalaropes were also more abundant in 2001. Personal observations by the authors noted more abundant brine fly production during this low water year, which may have contributed to the larger numbers of phalaropes, gulls, and sandpipers. The survey year 2001 was also a better year for brine shrimp production than 1999. Counts at point samples did not always reflect these same patterns. Of 19 point samples, 74% had a greater ratio of species to habitat types in 1999 over the drier year of 2001 (Table 11 and Table 12).
Table 11. Comparison of species and habitat diversity at point samples in 1999 and 2001.
The values listed are ratios of the number of species to number of habitat types.
Table 12. Comparison of waterbird density (birds/ha) by suite at point samples
Go to Previous Section (Survey Area Descriptions) • Go to Next Section (Discussion)... |